The former Coal Secretary, P.C.
Parakh, said that if he was named a conspirator in the coal scam case, Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh was a party to the conspiracy because he had approved
his recommendation to allocate a coal block to Hindalco, a company of the Kumar
Mangalam Birla-led Aditya Birla Group.
Mr. Parakh, 68, a retired IAS
officer of the Andhra Pradesh cadre, termed the CBI’s charges against him
baseless and shocking. In its First Information
Report, the investigating
agency alleged that Mr. Parakh had re-considered his decision on a coal block allotment
to Hindalco in his capacity as screening committee chairman as part of a
criminal conspiracy to favour the company.
Mr. Parakh |
Speaking at his residence in Hyderabad , Mr. Parakh said
it was true there were two equally eligible applicants: Neyveli Lignite
Corporation (NLC), a public sector undertaking; and Hindalco. The screening
committee made the first recommendation in favour of the NLC but the decision
was reviewed when the PMO forwarded Mr. Birla’s representation for
reconsideration.
There
were 2 equally eligible applicants: NLC and HINDALCO
The
screening committee made the first recommendation in favour of the NLC but the
decision was reviewed when the PMO forwarded Mr. Birla’s representation for
reconsideration.
=======================================================
“I supported the allotment of the coal block to
Neyveli [NLC] as it was a PSU. After reconsidering the case, to be fair to two
companies which were equally competent, we decided to accommodate both.” – Mr. P
C Parakh (Former Coal Secretary)
=======================================================
He said: “I found there was
merit in his case. Hindalco was the first applicant and had the financial and
technical competence and also a project on hand. I supported the allotment of
the coal block to Neyveli [NLC] as it was a PSU. After reconsidering the case, to
be fair to two companies which were equally competent, we decided to
accommodate both. As Hindalco could not be given a block under government
dispensation, we allotted the said coal block from the captive list and
allotted another block outside the captive list to the PSU.
Asked what he made out of the
CBI’s allegation, Mr. Parakh said there was no case at all and he would come
out clean. If at all, the CBI might blame him
for a wrong decision. But a wrong
decision would not amount to conspiracy or corruption, and the CBI had no
evidence to prove its conspiracy theory. He felt the CBI was unable to make a
distinction between a fair and correct decision made in the public interest and
something which was malafide.
Mr. Kumar Mangalam Brila |
Clarifying that Mr. Birla had
met him only once at his office, he said there was no pressure at all from the
PMO to review the decision. “As the Coal Secretary, I made a recommendation and
the Prime Minister, who was also holding coal portfolio, agreed with it. He
could have overruled my recommendation. If the CBI says I am wrong, the Prime
Minister is also wrong.”
Arguing that the coal mining
rights allocation would not have come under a cloud, had the government adopted
auction, Mr. Parakh said he made a strong pitch for bidding, but it was opposed
by the then Coal Minister, Shibu Soren, and his deputy Dasari Narayana Rao.
No comments:
Post a Comment