Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai asked India ’s
Permanent Representative to UN Dileep Sinha to move seven amendments. On
reaching Geneva , Mr. Sinha contacted his
American counterpart and informed him about India ’s desire. The principal
amendment would have brought the progress made by Sri Lanka in implementing the
report of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) under the
gaze of the international community.
The U.S. ,
after consulting other co-sponsors of the resolution, came back to India
late on Wednesday and said the incorporation of Indian amendments could lead to
a fracture in the alliance favouring the resolution. These included some
African countries who, as it is, were uneasy allies. From Asia, while Japan was mollified by Sri Lankan President
Mahinda Rajapaksa’s recent visit and voted against the resolution, South Korea , with a newly elected government,
was a cat on the wall (it finally voted with India
and the United States ).
The U.S. Permanent
Representative told Mr. Sinha that his country wanted to increase the margin as
compared to last time rather than see a depletion in the strength of those
questioning Sri Lanka ’s
human rights record during the closing phases of the conflict between its
security forces and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.
Therefore, India decided not to press for amendments and
fell in line with the resolution as hammered together by the U.S. and other co-sponsors.
Related links:-
No comments:
Post a Comment