The Centre submitted before
the Madras High Court said that, Indian fishermen have no right to fish in and
around Katchatheevu—the islet ceded to Sri Lanka —according to two
bilateral pacts signed in 1974 and 1976. The Centre specified its stand in a
counter affidavit when a PIL came up for hearing before the first bench
comprising Chief Justice R K Agrawal and Justice K Ravichandrabaabu.
Ahead of scheduled talks between
fisherfolk of the two countries, the Union government’s position is at variance
with that taken by all stakeholders
in Tamil Nadu, who question the ceding of the islet and insist on fishermen’s
rights to look for catch in that area. Sri Lanka ’s sovereignty over
Katchatheevu was a settled matter, the Centre maintained.
The PIL filed by L T A Peter
Rayan, president, Fisherman Care, contended that External Affairs Minister
Salman Khurshid’s statement in Rajya Sabha, in response to a Calling Attention
Notice of AIADMK MP V Maitreyan on the Sri Lankan Navy’s attacks on Indian
fishermen, appeared to be in contravention of the 1974 agreement. Rayan said
the agreement guaranteed rights to fishermen of both countries to enjoy
traditional rights of fishing in each other’s waters.
The counter said that, Article
6 of the 1974 agreement does not confer fishing rights to Indian fishermen at
Katchatheevu and only speaks of traditional rights of vessels, not fishermen. Thus,
no rights of fishing in Lankan waters were bestowed under the 1974 and 1976 agreements.
The Centre also informed the court that Wadge Bank, near Kaniyakumari, came
within India ’s Exclusive
Economic Zone—where India
has sovereign rights on the area and its resources as per the 1976 agreement—while
settling the issue of a maritime boundary between India and Lanka. Also, under the 1974
and 1976 agreements, traditional rights only allowed access to fishermen to
visit Katchatheevu to dry nets and rest—not for fishing rights in the area—and
for pilgrims to attend the annual St Antony festival.
No comments:
Post a Comment