Five days after Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi
slugged it out online, the representatives of some of India's best known PR and
social media marketing agencies - like Mahesh Murthy of Pinstorm, Dileep
Cherian of Perfect Relations and S Swaminathan of Iris Biz Services, found
themselves making pitches to political strategists of the Congress and the BJP.
Calling in the professionals is a step up for
political parties, for whom a social media strategy has largely meant a mix of
volunteers and old timers updating websites and sending e-mailers from a dingy
backroom.
So what's changed for politicians to take Facebook
and Twitter seriously? The numbers: at the time of the 2009 election, there
were only 1.6 million social media users. But today, the number has jumped to 65
million, roughly 5% of the population. And by the time of the projected next
election, in late 2013, or early 14, that figure could be 80 million.
Politicians are also apparently impressed with
social media's role in the recent street protests - like the ones after Mumbai's
26/11 strike, the Anna Hazare agitation and the protests sparked by the Delhi gang-rape.
Groups
like the Iris Business Services, have now sliced the data further to
demonstrate it is relevance in an Indian election. Iris mapped Facebook users
by Lok Sabha constituencies to find that in 160 constituencies, the number of
Facebook users was higher than the margin of victory. For instance, in Thane, the
margin of victory was 49000 votes. The number of Facebook users in Thane is 4,19,000.
Swaminathan points out that these are not limited
to big cities, but cities as far afield as Jaipur, Indore ,
Madurai and Patiala , all have significant social media
clusters, mainly due to the spread of smartphones. India only has
about 13 million internet connections. But a majority - almost 60% - connect to
social media via smartphones.
At the same time, the study is a highly simplistic
exercise. There is no deeper study of how many Facebook users are voters, or
whether they are politically engaged. Nor is their evidence to suggest that
social media can influence election outcomes.
Swaminthan says, "It is no one's contention
that FB users will vote as a block. But for example, the place where I live in
Thane, the Thane Facebook user community is considerably more homogeneous than
the Thane electorate. It's also likely given again the bulk of these voters are
probably first-time voters. Most of them are below the age of 25. It can have
an impact in terms of voter turnout as well. When you combine all these things
together, the contention is not that they will vote as a community and that
they will determine who will win or lose. It's just basically saving that they
have the critical mass to influence the election." So social media might
have reached critical mass in India
- but how can it be leveraged to help political parties?
At his Mumbai office, Mahesh Murthy says the same
social media strategies he used to promote his corporate clients could also
work for political parties. For example, Pinstorm runs the Twitter account of
Cadbury Dairy Milk , where they aim to generate what he calls 'remark worthy' tweets.
He says he can provide the same service to political parties. Pinstorm also runs Cadbury's Facebook page, which
it peoples with interactive content.
Members
of the Congress and BJP said they were interested, but refused to commit as to
whether they were signing these agencies.
No comments:
Post a Comment