The Committee has recommended
that each state may get a fixed basic allocation of 0.3 per cent of overall
funds, to which will be added its share stemming from need and performance to
get its overall share. The Committee has also come up with a Multi Dimensional
Index of Backwardness based on per capita consumption as measured by the NSSO,
the poverty ratio, and a number of other measures which correspond to the multi
dimensional approach to defining poverty outlined in the Twelfth Plan.
The Committee has recommended
that states that score 0.6 and above on the Index may be classified as
"Least Developed"; states that score below 0.6 and above 0.4 may be
classified as "Less Developed"; and states that score below 0.4 may
be classified as "Relatively Developed".
Chidamabaram also stated that
the Committee has observed that the demand for funds and special attention of
different states will be more than adequately met by the twin recommendations
of the basic allocation of 0.3 per cent of overall funds to each state and the
categorisation of States that score 0.6 and above as "least
developed" states. According to the Committee, these two recommendations,
along with the allocation methodology, effectively subsume what is now
"Special Category".
The six-member committee
consisted of Raghuram G Rajan (Chairman), Shaibal Gupta (member), Bharat
Ramaswami (member), Najeeb Jung (member), Nirija G Jayal (member), Tuhin Pandey
(member).
#
|
States
|
Score
|
Category
|
1
|
Odisha
|
0.798
|
Least Developed
|
2
|
0.765
|
||
3
|
Madhya Pradesh
|
0.759
|
|
4
|
Chhattisgarh
|
0.752
|
|
5
|
Jharkhand
|
0.746
|
|
6
|
Arunachal Pradesh
|
0.729
|
|
7
|
0.707
|
||
8
|
Meghalaya
|
0.693
|
|
9
|
Uttar Pradesh
|
0.638
|
|
10
|
Rajasthan
|
0.626
|
|
11
|
Manipur
|
0.571
|
Less Developed
|
12
|
0.551
|
||
13
|
Nagaland
|
0.546
|
|
14
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
0.521
|
|
15
|
Jammu & Kashmir
|
0.504
|
|
16
|
Mizoram
|
0.495
|
|
17
|
0.491
|
||
18
|
Tripura
|
0.474
|
|
19
|
Karnataka
|
0.453
|
|
20
|
0.430
|
||
21
|
Himachal Pradesh
|
0.404
|
|
22
|
Haryana
|
0.395
|
Relatively Developed
|
23
|
Uttarakhand
|
0.383
|
|
24
|
0.352
|
||
25
|
0.345
|
||
26
|
Tamil Nadu
|
0.341
|
|
27
|
Kerala
|
0.095
|
|
28
|
0.045
|
No comments:
Post a Comment