While a Congress-DMK alliance
for the 2014 Lok Sabha election appears certain, the UPA government's
submission in the Supreme Court on the Sethusamudram shipping canal project on
Monday reiterates a growing proximity between the two parties. The Centre's sudden keenness to implement it
along the controversial Ram Sethu alignment brings it into direct conflict with
BJP. But, more significant is the fact that it gives DMK a face-saving excuse
to renew ties with Congress, which it had snapped barely six months ago on the
Tamil Eelam issue. Congress also believes that the Sethu project will boost its
prospects in Tamil Nadu.
"We have been putting
pressure on the government to implement the project. It is a happy outcome,"
said DMK spokesperson T K S Elangovan. The party leadership is practical enough
to realise that the poll arithmetic would be better with the national party on
its side. "The UPA government's stand on the Sethu project will help us
explain to the people why the party is returning to Congress fold after the
brief estrangement," said a DMK leader.
Tamil Nadu Congress leaders
point out that while the Centre's stand was bound to make DMK happy, the final
verdict would be delivered by the Supreme Court. Dismissing any political motive
behind the government's stand on the project in the court, TNCC president B S
Gnanadesikan said, "The government will take a decision not based on
political considerations, but on realities."
The Centre submitted an
affidavit in the Supreme Court stating that it intended to implement the
Sethusamundram project without changing the original alignment that cuts across
Adam's Bridge , considered the mythical Ram
Setu. The affidavit stated the government did not accept the R K Pachauri
committee's recommendations that the project was economically and ecologically
unviable. It also rejected the Tamil Nadu government's stand that project
should be scrapped on the ground that it was of "questionable economic
value and not in the public interest".
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh
had appointed the Pachauri committee after the Supreme Court asked the
government to explore alternative alignments to avoid destruction of Adam's Bridge . Hindutva parties believe it is a natural
heritage structure which must be preserved and can not be sacrificed for
navigational advantage and easier movement of ships.
The Pachauri committee report
said the project would be an ecological disaster. It based its conclusion on
factors like ocean currents and wind speeds. BJP national executive member L
Ganesan said the project could be implemented without destroying or tampering
with the Ram Sethu.
No comments:
Post a Comment