Saturday, September 28, 2013

Rahul Gandhi Vs Manmohan Singh

Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi’s criticism of the government effectively put the controversial ordinance on convicted legislators on hold: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, away in the United States on a bilateral visit, was forced to issue a statement from Washington. But with the attack sending confused signals through the Congress on the position of the Prime Minister, party president Sonia Gandhi, reassured the Prime Minister on the telephone, saying there was no intention to undermine his position.
Earlier, the Congress and the UPA government were caught completely off-guard when Mr. Gandhi “dropped in” at a Meet-the-Press programme addressed by party general secretary Ajay Maken, only to denounce the ordinance cleared by the Union cabinet — and on which President Pranab Mukherjee had sought a government briefing.
With this outburst coming in the wake of Mr. Mukherjee having made his discomfort with the ordinance known to Law Minister Kapil Sibal and Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde — when they met him for well over an hour at Rashtrapati Bhawan.
For both the party and the government, nothing could have been more embarrassing than the Congress vice president’s bombshell minutes after Mr. Maken had defended the ordinance. Worse, virtually at the same moment, at another venue, unaware of the drama unfolding at the Press Club of India (PCI), Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting Manish Tewari and Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office V. Narayanswamy, too, were explaining the need for the ordinance. Earlier, minutes after Mr. Maken began to speak, he received a phone call from Mr. Gandhi, who asked whether he could join him at the PCI.



 In the less than 10 minutes Mr. Gandhi was there, he proceeded to give what he repeatedly described as his “personal opinion.” The ordinance, he said, was “complete nonsense” and it “should be torn up and thrown away.” He said the “arguments” made in his own party in favour of the ordinance were that there were “political considerations,” arguments that he said were being made in all other parties. “It is time to stop this nonsense, political parties, mine and all others,” Mr. Gandhi said as he rolled up his sleeves, “if we want to fight corruption, we can’t continue making these small compromises. Because if we make these small compromises, then we compromise everywhere.”
As he got up to leave, members of a suddenly galvanised press wanted to know whether Mr. Gandhi’s views had been shaped by the flak the ordinance was getting from the Opposition. He returned to his seat to say: “I’m not interested in the opposition, I am interested in what the Congress party is doing and what our government is doing.” And then came the punchline: “I personally feel what my government has done is wrong,” before he made a dramatic exit. Mr. Maken retracted all that he had said earlier in the press meet to declaim: “Rahul’s view is that of the Congress party.”

The ordinance is complete nonsense. It should be torn up and thrown away. What the government is doing with this is completely wrong
à Mr. Rahul Gandhi, Congress Vice-President
The Country is waiting to see whether the PM has any self-respect left….Whether he accepts the decision of his cabinet being called nonsense, or doe she react for the honour of his own government
à Mr. Arun Jaitely, BJP (Opposition leader, Rajya Sabha)
Enough is Enough. The PM should quit. This type of blame on the government for a decision that was obviously taken in consultation with the party amounts to insubordination”
à Mr. Sanjay Baru, former adviser to Dr. Manmohan Singh
Set to GO?
(i)Mr. Rasheed Masood (Congress)
(ii)Mr. Lalu Prasad Yadav (RJD)
SC Order & Ordinance
Law prior to July 2013: Sitting legislators could hold onto seats while their appeal was pending, even if convicted for crimes
What SC ruled in July 2013?: Sitting legislator convicted for such a crime to be immediately disqualified
What Ordinance says?: Sitting legislator so convicted would be allowed to continue pending an appeal. He wouldn’t be allowed to vote in the House or draw a salary


No comments:

Post a Comment