Thursday, July 11, 2013

EC welcomes the SC verdict on MPs, MLAs to be disqualified on date of criminal conviction

The Election Commission has welcomed the Supreme Court verdict declaring ultra vires Section 8 (4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 that allowed convicted MPs, MLAs and MLCs to continue their membership if they had appealed against their conviction/sentence within three months of the date of judgment. Similarly, it was happy with another order in the judgment that barred jailed persons from contesting polls, “though there are some grey areas in the verdict.”
          An official in the Election Commission said that, EC want to check criminals from contesting polls and becoming people’s representatives, but these reforms have not yet been approved by Parliament. On the order on banning those in jails from contesting polls, he said though under 62 (5) of the RP Act, no person who is in jail/police custody/preventive detention, could participate in polling, there were instances where court’s permission was obtained to exercise their franchise. Even in the Presidential poll, an MP, who was in jail for corruption cases, had voted with the permission of the court.
Some questions:-
If a jailed person is prevented from contesting poll, what will happen if a person is arrested and jailed after his nomination was accepted by the returning officer during scrutiny? Or
What will happen if the person is arrested during the campaign period or on the polling day? Are they eligible to contest the poll or not?”
 The former Chief Election Commissioner, Navin Chawla, too welcomed the verdict as “a step in the right direction.” He wanted the government to approve the Commission’s suggestion for decriminalisation of politics. As per the RP Act, a person, who has been convicted and sentenced to two-year imprisonment or more, cannot contest any poll to Parliament, Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council.
However, in cases relating to dacoity, FERA, rape, dowry, NDPS Act (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act), POTA (Prevention of Terrorism Act) and bribery, mere conviction would disqualify a person from contesting any election. This is applicable even if the person is on bail after the conviction and his appeal is pending for disposal in the higher court. The disqualification will be in force for six years from the date of release of the person from jail.

An in-depth study by National Election Watch and Association of Democratic Reforms says 31% Mps and MLAs have criminal past
1448 MPs/MLAs have pending criminal cases
At least 82% of the MPs and MLAs elected on JMM tickets declared criminal cases in their affidavits
162 of them are Lok Sabha Members
Lalu Prasad-led RJD has 64% cases

48% of the Mulayam-led SP has criminal cases against them
641 Legislators with grave charges of murder, rape and kidnap among others
In the Congress, 305 of 1433 MPs and MLAs have declared criminal records, accounting to 21%
6 Legislators’ affidavits say they are facing rape charges

Of BJP’s 1017 members, 313 has declared it, amounting to 31% of its legislators



TAINT IN LEGISLATURES
Lok Sabha (543 members)
30% (162 members) have criminal cases against them
14% (77 members) have serious criminal cases against them
MLAs in State Assemblies (4032 members)
31% (1258 members) have criminal cases against them
14% (565 members) have serious criminal cases against them

The Supreme Court held that chargesheeted Members of Parliament and MLAs, on conviction for offences, will be immediately disqualified from holding membership of the House without being given three months’ time for appeal, as was the case before. A Bench of Justices A.K. Patnaik and S.J. Mukhopadhaya struck down as unconstitutional Section 8 (4) of the Representation of the People Act that allows convicted lawmakers a three-month period for filing appeal to the higher court and to get a stay of the conviction and sentence. The Bench, however, made it clear that the ruling will be prospective and those who had already filed appeals in various High Courts or the Supreme Court against their convictions would be exempt from it.

Related Links:-

No comments:

Post a Comment